Unnecessary Packaging

16 Aug, 2008

Un-nesting blocks

Posted by: amyleland In: Uncategorized

We recently purchased these nesting blocks for our youngest son, and the packaging was so hilarious I had to post.

In the picture you can see where the box advertises the “blocks nest for easy storage.” You’d think this important selling point would carry over to “nesting for easy packaging and distribution,” but the manufacturer decided it was necessary to separate the blocks into two groups and bag them separately so they wouldn’t nest, thereby requiring a box twice as tall and a bunch of extra plastic waste.

Why would making it appear that the blocks take up more room be advantageous to a product that is obviously meant to save space?

We purchased these to replace a worn-out set my older son used, which actually was packaged in nested form, with the largest box having a closing bottom and carrying handle. Unfortunately this kind was no longer available, or I would have went for that instead.

2 Responses to "Un-nesting blocks"

1 | Waste-Knot

August 16th, 2008 at 6:26 pm

Avatar

Thanks for calling out our first offender here!

Shelcore is a toy company from China, owned by Matrix Holdings Hong Kong. Their website, http://www.shelcore.com, shows their toy lines, as well as where you can purchase them in the US and Canada. They also share with their consumers, the following “Green Promise”:

“As parents you want the best possible for your children. So do we. That’s why we are committed to becoming 100% Green, whenever possible.

Our manufacturing plants are currently industry leaders in their commitment to being Green. For example, all extra plastic shavings from toys are recycled and made into storage bins and shipping containers. Reaching our goals won’t happen overnight, but everyday we’re becoming a little more efficient. Meaning a brighter future for you and your children.”

(Perhaps they are also using those “extra plastic shavings” to make all those plastic bags used to individually pack all the nesting boxes too.)

The Parent Zone area of the Shelcore site also has a Testimonials page, which doesn’t make any mention of their overuse of plastic packaging at all. It only sings the high praises of their products, with a rather biased cross-section of customer revues snipped from Amazon.com. There is also a Tips & Advice section under construction at this time. I’m not sure if this is Shelcore offering tips and advice to consumers, or consumers giving THEM tips and advice, but if it’s the latter, guess who’s going to be their first poster?!

Rest assured, we’re on the case, and as soon as we get a response from Shelcore in regards to this matter, we will post it here. We’ll be sure to not just quote their answer, but to produce an actual visual file of whatever they send us. Whether they fax or email us, you will see whatever they write. Accountability is a great thing, isn’t it? ;)

Thanks again,

Waste-Knot

2 | amy

August 17th, 2008 at 1:09 pm

Avatar

It really gets me when one aspect is “green” but another completely overrides any environmental benefit… such as making unnecessary packaging from recycled plastic. How about no plastic?
Green is really just a word anyway, and I think that saying they are committed to becoming green (when possible) is just a marketing ploy. There are no specifications to enforce, no “green” certifications, just their word that they are becoming “Greener,” whatever that means.

Comment Form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Flickr PhotoStream

  • Not So Green Packaging
  • Eine Weißwurst macht noch keinen Sommer
  • New Ipod Touch
  • Packaging waste #3

About

Companies need to start being held responsible for the amount of packaging they put around their products. Products are shipped in excessively sized boxes full of harmful packaging materials. We need to let these companies know that we are not happy with these practices.

Categories